PC World, Linux examined by the ‘informed’

July 10th, 2008 by sshaw Leave a reply »

Well I’d talk about the article, but well you are just going to have to read it.  Just a quick gem though from the article:

The big question is: Given that Red Hat bases its Fedora distribution on OpenSUSE, and that Fedora and OpenSUSE are both distributions with advanced features intended for power users, why would you pick one over the other?

openSUSE Examined

Posted in blog

Tags:

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 Feed. You can leave a response , or trackback from your own site.

Advertisement
  • http://gnuray.blogspot.com Ray

    well… :)

  • Matt Domsch

    I believe the article author is confused on this point. Fedora and OpenSuSE share a lot of common code, and each project has developers contributing to the whole of Open Source and Free Software which the other then incorporates, it’s quite a stretch to say that Fedora is “based on” OpenSuSE.

  • http://www.decriptor.com sshaw

    I realize that, I was just pointing it out as a flaw and lack of investigating the subject before writing about it. So uninformed information. It makes me start to wonder about the rest of it.

  • http://www.cristianrodriguez.net/ Cristian Rodríguez

    oh dear.. and I thought ZDNET provided the most clueless linux articles..
    :-D